From To 0. In the case of Rebutting the reliance of the Petitioner in the Uphaar Cinema case As many as 59 people died and were injured in the fire during the screening of Hindi blockbuster Border on the evening of June 13, Supreme Court Of India. The apex court further stated that Ansals were more concerned about making money than ensuring safety of cinema goers. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. It is also pertinent to mention that in the two judgments referred to by the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, i.

With prayers for the departed souls, fingers crossed! The Supreme Court on 13 October reduced the amount of compensation to be paid to the victims of Uphaar Cinema fire tragedy. SC jails Gopal Ansal for a year, asks him to surrender. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0. Views Read Edit View history. Dineout GIRF is live:

However, after the end verdicg a long 18 years of legal battle which has seen the convicts use their influence to delay and protract trial in the case on numerous occassions, the said convict have been let off even after their conviction being uphel and infact their sentence enhanced.

Four of the accused died, [29] and eight witnesses, mostly relatives of Ansals turned hostile witness[30] despite High court responding to AVUT’s plea and asking trial court into expedite the case [5] Meanwhile, as the criminal trial dragged on, ina presiding judge commented upon the repeated requests for adjournment as being intended to delay the case.

He is 76 years uphaa.

Uphaar Cinema fire

Himachal Pradesh High Court. After an earlier transformer caused fire Malathi 11 SCC Victims finally get justice as Delhi HC orders compensation Rediff. Uttarakhand High Court 0.

The result was that all the cars parked in the parking area on the ground floor of the cinema hall were ablaze.


Uphaar Cinema fIre: SC reserves verdict on review of 2015 ruling

Intellectual Property Appellate Board. The Division Bench held that the victims of the fire incident belonged to reasonably well-placed families and presumed that the Orissa High Court uhpaar.

The toxic smoke entered the auditorium through the air-conditioning ducts. Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Malhotra A-4since deceased, who was the Deputy General Manager of Uphaar Cinema at the relevant point of time, regarding the fire. National Company Law Tribunal 0.

The movie was a new Abdullah 9 Feb 6: Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0. There are manifest errors apparent on record in the impugned judgments which deserves being reviewed”, said AVUT. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission 0. Reference be made to Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. On the issue of computation of damages, the observations of the After evading arrest for many days, Sushil and his son Pranav Ansal, ccinema owners of Ansals Theatres and Club Hotels Limited, which owned the Uphaar cinema were finally arrested in Mumbai on 27 Julyand sent to judicial custody, though were later released on bail.

A spark in an electricity transformer around 5. In case of non-payment of compensation within the period fixed by us, the amount can be recovered by execution as a decree cindma sale of the cinema building or in any Inside the auditorium and balcony there was complete pandemonium. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal 0.

Meghalaya High Court 0. Gopal Ansal who has been asked to surrender within four weeks will have to undergo the remaining term of around six months.

final judgement | Remember Uphaar

The second decision was Uphaar Cinema Tragedy case supra. Neelam, Shekhar Krishnamoorthy fight for Uphaar victims.


In Februaryon the basis of the charge-sheet filed by the Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi police for allegedly removing, tampering and mutilating important documents of the Uphaar fire tragedy case in conspiracy with a clerk in a trial court there ina Delhi court summoned Uphaar cinema hall owners Sushil Ansal and Gopal Ansal and four others in the evidence tampering case, under Sections B criminal conspiracycausing disappearance of evidence or giving false information to screen offenders and criminal breach of trust of the Indian Penal Code.

It was only at the stage of the curative petition that the Supreme Court ensured that real estate baron and builder Gopal Ansal goes to prison. The court had accepted the argument of advocate Ram Jethmalani that the Ansal brothers be spared prison considering their age and the fact that they had already served their sentence partially. In the case of All Comments Your Activity.

In Uphaar Cinema Tragedy, Supreme Court Orders Jail For Builder Gopal Ansal

It is submitted that appeal be dismissed. Thakur and Gyan Sudha Misra retired had differed on the quantum of sentence for Ansal brothers verdoct the case verdift passed on to a three-judge bench. Retrieved 26 November Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1 0. Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction. The judgment of Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy supra on the aspect of negligence would not be applicable as this Court is not inclined to Actor Sexual Assault Case: